Timothy R. Primrose, Mobile Forensic Analyst
Dashcams have become indispensable tools for drivers and can often provide crucial evidence in the event of an accident. However, not all dashcams timestamp the videos, which can pose significant challenges when determining the exact time of a crash, hindering the ability to rule out distracted driving due to cell phone use. In such cases, audio captured from the vehicle’s audio system can play a pivotal role in establishing the timeline of events.
The Role of Radio Audio in Establishing Timelines
If the driver was listening to traditional radio, analyzing the broadcast can provide insight into the time of the incident:
Streaming Services and Bluetooth Audio
In addition to traditional radio, many drivers listen to music through streaming services like Spotify, Apple Music, or Pandora using Bluetooth or auxiliary connections. These platforms can also assist in pinpointing the time of a crash:
Practical Applications and Case Studies
The practical application of these methods can be illustrated through real-world case studies:
Case Study 1: A Morning Commute Crash
During a crash investigation, the subject vehicle’s dashcam was found to have captured a segment of a popular morning radio show. By identifying the host’s voice and checking the radio station’s schedule, the investigators determined the crash occurred at approximately 8:35 a.m. With this information, investigators reviewed the data from the vehicle operator’s cell phone, revealing that the TikTok application was open at that time.
Case Study 2: Streaming Service Evidence
In another incident, the driver was listening to a curated playlist on Spotify. The vehicle’s dashcam recorded audio of a specific song during the time of the crash. By accessing the driver’s Spotify history, investigators confirmed that the song started at 3:10 p.m., providing an accurate crash time. The vehicle operator had ended a phone call at 3:04 p.m. and did not have any other phone usage leading up to or at the time of the crash. A call was made after the crash at 3:13 p.m., so distracted driving could be ruled out.
Case Study 3: Manual Time Input
According to the timestamp associated with the vehicle’s dashcam, it was determined that the operator was on their phone at the time of crash. The defendant claimed that since they had manually input the timestamp into their camera and it was not synced to GPS, the time was off, and they weren’t on their phone at the time of the crash. However, the radio was on at the time of the crash. The radio host could be heard saying, “It’s currently 5:14, oh wait, now 5:15 p.m.,” approximately 4 seconds before the dashcam said it was 5:15 p.m. Even with the camera being 4 seconds off, the original consensus, that the defendant was on their phone at the time of the incident, remained true.
In the absence of a timestamped dashcam, audio from the car’s radio or streaming services can be an invaluable tool for determining the time of a crash. Radio stations’ playlists, recognizable radio hosts, and scheduled news segments provide a framework for pinpointing the time. Similarly, logs from streaming services offer precise data that can corroborate the timeline of events. By leveraging these audio sources, investigators can piece together accurate timelines, ensuring that the truth of the incident is accurately documented.
Categories: Digital Forensics | Education | Timothy R. Primrose